Loading Motifs…
Decide how much of the product a new user can use before paying — from a free tier with a locked premium slice to a hard paywall with nothing past onboarding. Conversion and growth move in opposite directions.
10.7% vs 2.1%Median share of installs paying within 35 days: hard-paywall apps vs freemium apps in RevenueCat's 2025 data. Different apps that chose their own model — not a test of switching.
Product screens: Headspace via PaywallScreens ↗. Screens illustrate the product; the number is sourced in the evidence below.
Built from published experiments and company reports across several products. Nobody has checked the screens on a dated day, so read each number with the caveat printed beside it.
Decide how much of the product a new user can use before paying — from a free tier with a locked premium slice to a hard paywall with nothing past onboarding. Conversion and growth move in opposite directions.
A generous free tier can let people keep coming back to one free thing without ever seeing why to pay, as Headspace found; a hard paywall can slow growth, as Opal found (Headspace and Opal, on the Sub Club podcast).
This play is not tied to a full playbook. Use it for this decision alone.
Locking Headspace's whole library behind a trial lifted paid subscribers.
COMPANY-REPORTEDWhat it does not show Staff account on a vendor podcast; no numbers, sample size, window or confidence interval. Whether "lift" is relative is not stated.
How Headspace Optimized Revenue by Gating Content — Shreya Oswal and Keya Patel, Headspace Sub Club Podcast (RevenueCat)
Headspace converted more users as it locked more content.
COMPANY-REPORTEDWhat it does not show Described as tests and experiments; the design, randomization and figures are not given. A free trial and price tests were introduced in the same period and rolled out together at the end of 2019.
How Headspace Optimized Revenue by Gating Content — Shreya Oswal and Keya Patel, Headspace Sub Club Podcast (RevenueCat)
One app's move to freemium more than halved subscriber conversion.
COMPANY-REPORTEDUse the play for this decision alone, or combine it with an existing product strategy after checking for conflicts.
Conversion-rate comparisons hide the top of the funnel: Opal's paying share fell while daily users grew. Whichever you track decides which way the change looks.
Locking content existing free users already rely on is a different change from locking it for new users; Headspace handled the two groups separately and paid for the transition with a discount.
A free tier too generous leaves no reason to upgrade; one too thin loses users before they form a habit.
Plus everything above, as plain text for your coding agent, with a short instruction on top: check the fit, say what the evidence doesn’t support, and adapt it rather than copy it. Paste it and you get an answer, no prompt to write.
Company accounts from Headspace, Opal and two advisor clients, RevenueCat's benchmark, and one quasi-experiment at the New York Times · evidence reviewed 25 September 2026.
Explore company-inspired strategies that connect your product, experience, and growth.
Browse the playbooks ↗What it does not show Anonymous; the metric's definition, baseline and window, and whether the reduction is relative, are not given. What the free tier contained is not described.
How a switch from hard paywall to freemium led to a 75% LTV lift and a 50% conversion drop RevenueCat blog (David Barnard) · 2026
Hard-paywall apps convert more of their installs than freemium apps.
COMPANY-REPORTEDWhat it does not show Observational; apps that choose a hard paywall differ from freemium apps in category, price and audience. How apps were classified by access method, sample sizes per group and confidence intervals are not given. Organic growth, word of mouth and free-user value are not measured.
State of Subscription Apps 2026 RevenueCat
Tightening the New York Times' free access raised subscriptions and cut reading.
SUPPORTINGWhat it does not show Quasi-experiment, not randomized; for subscriptions there is no natural control group and the groups compared may differ. A news publisher with advertising revenue, not a subscription app.
Digital Paywall Design: Implications for Content Demand and Subscriptions Aral and Dhillon
Another app raised LTV per user 75% by moving to freemium.
COMPANY-REPORTEDWhat it does not show Bundle; the 75% cannot be attributed to the access model rather than the pricing and packaging changes. Anonymous; no window, baseline or sample size.
How a switch from hard paywall to freemium led to a 75% LTV lift and a 50% conversion drop RevenueCat blog (David Barnard) · 2026
After Opal went free, daily users passed a million and the paying share fell.
COMPANY-REPORTEDWhat it does not show No revenue figure after the switch; the growth claims are the founder's description. The metric's definition conflicts across sources; no window is given. Read from auto-generated captions and a vendor write-up.
The counterintuitive freemium strategy that scaled Opal to 1M daily active users RevenueCat blog (David Barnard) · 2026